The Supreme Court today questioned the maintenance of the application challenging the provision to file a support and income tax return with PAN number.
The apex court said that the provision of the Income Tax Act has been approved by making a compulsory mandatory filing of a tax return in the allotment of permanent account number (PAN) and the judgment given in June this year.
Now, how can this application be maintained? We supported the bribe (provision), now the verdict on the right of privacy has come, but there is no verdict on the basis. How has this application been filed? "Justice AK Sikri and Ashok Bhushan asked.
Leader of CPA, petitioner Benois Visamam, appealed to the lawyers, withdrew the argument.
The bench allowed the freedom to file an application for intervention in the main case, which is scheduled to be scheduled for hearing before the Constitution Bench in the last week of this month.
The Supreme Court upheld the income tax department section 139A on June 9, in which compulsory support was made for filing a PAN card and filing a tax return, but partly on implementation of the privacy rights by the bench in the Bench Invested.
Later, the dissolution of the Constitution was declared as the fundamental right of privacy.
In the Section 139 of the Income Tax Act, this year, for filing income tax returns from July 1st this year, the name of the PF or the support application form has been filed for issuing compulsory tickets and allotment of PAN.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court today refused to hear a separate application, which gave the challenge to link support to bank accounts.
The court said that it can not hear many applications arising out of such problem and the applicant has ordered an application for intervention in the main case.
The apex court said that the provision of the Income Tax Act has been approved by making a compulsory mandatory filing of a tax return in the allotment of permanent account number (PAN) and the judgment given in June this year.
Now, how can this application be maintained? We supported the bribe (provision), now the verdict on the right of privacy has come, but there is no verdict on the basis. How has this application been filed? "Justice AK Sikri and Ashok Bhushan asked.
Leader of CPA, petitioner Benois Visamam, appealed to the lawyers, withdrew the argument.
The bench allowed the freedom to file an application for intervention in the main case, which is scheduled to be scheduled for hearing before the Constitution Bench in the last week of this month.
The Supreme Court upheld the income tax department section 139A on June 9, in which compulsory support was made for filing a PAN card and filing a tax return, but partly on implementation of the privacy rights by the bench in the Bench Invested.
Later, the dissolution of the Constitution was declared as the fundamental right of privacy.
In the Section 139 of the Income Tax Act, this year, for filing income tax returns from July 1st this year, the name of the PF or the support application form has been filed for issuing compulsory tickets and allotment of PAN.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court today refused to hear a separate application, which gave the challenge to link support to bank accounts.
The court said that it can not hear many applications arising out of such problem and the applicant has ordered an application for intervention in the main case.
No comments:
Post a Comment